Comments on: SETEC Astronomy http://ddos.arbornetworks.com/2006/05/setec-astronomy/ A weblog dedicated to educating the community on security threats that matter Sun, 29 Jan 2012 02:23:23 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v= By: Chris http://ddos.arbornetworks.com/2006/05/setec-astronomy/comment-page-1/#comment-236383 Chris Thu, 12 Nov 2009 07:33:24 +0000 http://asert.arbornetworks.com/2006/04/setec-astronomy/#comment-236383 No it's still unclear. Is your moral distinction based on the fact that it's installed in the router rather than the client? No it’s still unclear. Is your moral distinction based on the fact that it’s installed in the router rather than the client?

]]> By: Jeff Nathan http://ddos.arbornetworks.com/2006/05/setec-astronomy/comment-page-1/#comment-139 Jeff Nathan Tue, 23 May 2006 20:43:49 +0000 http://asert.arbornetworks.com/2006/04/setec-astronomy/#comment-139 In a manner of speaking, we make behavioral anomaly detection products of which Peakflow X can associate usernames as an additional axis of context. What Arbor doesn't make is spyware, which I'm sure you understand was the subject of the post. ;) In a manner of speaking, we make behavioral anomaly detection products of which Peakflow X can associate usernames as an additional axis of context.

What Arbor doesn’t make is spyware, which I’m sure you understand was the subject of the post. ;)

]]> By: Thomas H. Ptacek http://ddos.arbornetworks.com/2006/05/setec-astronomy/comment-page-1/#comment-136 Thomas H. Ptacek Tue, 23 May 2006 06:00:16 +0000 http://asert.arbornetworks.com/2006/04/setec-astronomy/#comment-136 Uh, don't you guys make software that allows network operators to monitor employees? Uh, don’t you guys make software that allows network operators to monitor employees?

]]>