<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 60 Days of Attack Scale &amp; Duration</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ddos.arbornetworks.com/2009/05/60-days-of-attack-scale-duration/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ddos.arbornetworks.com/2009/05/60-days-of-attack-scale-duration/</link>
	<description>A weblog dedicated to educating the community on security threats that matter</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 02:23:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mikey</title>
		<link>http://ddos.arbornetworks.com/2009/05/60-days-of-attack-scale-duration/comment-page-1/#comment-220670</link>
		<dc:creator>Mikey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 17:14:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asert.arbornetworks.com/?p=930#comment-220670</guid>
		<description>Thank you for posting this data. It&#039;s very hard to find ddos trend data posted anywhere on the internet.

One thing we&#039;ve noticed in our studies is that the attacks that come in are spoof-sourced from Chinese IP addresses. During mitigation, because our AS prepend didn&#039;t work as expected for AS&#039;s that *should* be in China, we are forced to assume that the actual sources of these spoofed packets are within domestic ASs.

It would be interesting to see bandwidth data for domestic providers for these types of attacks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for posting this data. It&#8217;s very hard to find ddos trend data posted anywhere on the internet.</p>
<p>One thing we&#8217;ve noticed in our studies is that the attacks that come in are spoof-sourced from Chinese IP addresses. During mitigation, because our AS prepend didn&#8217;t work as expected for AS&#8217;s that *should* be in China, we are forced to assume that the actual sources of these spoofed packets are within domestic ASs.</p>
<p>It would be interesting to see bandwidth data for domestic providers for these types of attacks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DDoS guru</title>
		<link>http://ddos.arbornetworks.com/2009/05/60-days-of-attack-scale-duration/comment-page-1/#comment-215072</link>
		<dc:creator>DDoS guru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 19:20:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asert.arbornetworks.com/?p=930#comment-215072</guid>
		<description>This is great data.  We have seen a major increase in attacks in recent months so this backs up what we are seeing.  It only seems to be getting worse, very scary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is great data.  We have seen a major increase in attacks in recent months so this backs up what we are seeing.  It only seems to be getting worse, very scary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny McPherson</title>
		<link>http://ddos.arbornetworks.com/2009/05/60-days-of-attack-scale-duration/comment-page-1/#comment-208226</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny McPherson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 19:28:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asert.arbornetworks.com/?p=930#comment-208226</guid>
		<description>Oops, yah, fixed.  Thanks!

-danny</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops, yah, fixed.  Thanks!</p>
<p>-danny</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jah</title>
		<link>http://ddos.arbornetworks.com/2009/05/60-days-of-attack-scale-duration/comment-page-1/#comment-208082</link>
		<dc:creator>jah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 19:17:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asert.arbornetworks.com/?p=930#comment-208082</guid>
		<description>9.8% being 1Gbps or larger!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>9.8% being 1Gbps or larger!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

