http://ddos.arbornetworks.com/2009/11/q3-2009-fast-flux-by-the-numbers/ A weblog dedicated to educating the community on security threats that matter Mon, 21 May 2012 14:58:37 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v= http://ddos.arbornetworks.com/2009/11/q3-2009-fast-flux-by-the-numbers/comment-page-1/#comment-239254 more “cyberwar” nonsense « Alternate Seat of TYR Sun, 29 Nov 2009 16:46:49 +0000 http://asert.arbornetworks.com/?p=1454#comment-239254 [...] ChinaNet is still the eighth spammiest domain on the Internet. Arbor Networks has some interesting charts on fast-flux DNS abuse, which show .cn as being the biggest real TLD for this particular form of mischief. Tellingly, it [...] [...] ChinaNet is still the eighth spammiest domain on the Internet. Arbor Networks has some interesting charts on fast-flux DNS abuse, which show .cn as being the biggest real TLD for this particular form of mischief. Tellingly, it [...]

]]> http://ddos.arbornetworks.com/2009/11/q3-2009-fast-flux-by-the-numbers/comment-page-1/#comment-236131 Dustin Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:49:51 +0000 http://asert.arbornetworks.com/?p=1454#comment-236131 Would be interesting to hear the story behind .tk whether its a false positive or there's an underlying explanation for the growth. In your experience working with TLDs, has the issue of false positives been a problem? Would be interesting to hear the story behind .tk whether its a false positive or there’s an underlying explanation for the growth. In your experience working with TLDs, has the issue of false positives been a problem?

]]>